UAL 811
The above aircraft was an: (1) aged (2) high flight time (3) early model
Boeing 747 (4) which took off in darkness (5) running late (6) and shortly
after takeoff (7) experienced a sudden initial event in the forward cargo
hold which left a (8) short (9) sudden (10) loud (11) sound on the cockpit
voice recorder, an (12) abrupt (13) power cut to the flight data recorder,
(14) foreign object damage to starboard engines #3 and (15) #4, (16) more
severe inflight damage on starboard side, (17) nine never recovered bodies,
(18) torn off skin in forward cargo door area on starboard side, (19) longitudinal
break at midline of the forward cargo door at midspan latch, (20) outward
peeled skin on upper forward fuselage, (21) vertical fuselage tear lines
forward of the wing and aft of forward cargo door, and (22) destruction
initially thought to be have been caused by a bomb.
Pan Am 103 
The above aircraft was an: (1) aged (2) high flight time (3) early model
Boeing 747 (4) which took off in darkness (5) running late (6) and shortly
after takeoff (7) experienced a sudden initial event in the forward cargo
hold which left a (8) short (9) sudden (10) loud (11) sound on the cockpit
voice recorder, an (12) abrupt (13) power cut to the flight data recorder,
(14) foreign object damage to starboard engines #3 and (15) #4, (16) more
severe inflight damage on starboard side, (17) nine never recovered bodies,
(18) torn off skin in forward cargo door area on starboard side, (19) longitudinal
break at midline of the forward cargo door at midspan latch, (20) outward
peeled skin on upper forward fuselage, (21) vertical fuselage tear lines
forward of the wing and aft of forward cargo door, and (22) destruction
initially thought to be have been caused by a bomb.
The Air Accidents Investigation Branch of UK has given the probable cause
for Pan Am 103 as the explosion of an improvised explosive device in the
forward cargo hold. The probable cause of UAL 811 was the inadvertent opening
of the forward cargo door inflight as described in NTSB AAR 92/02 from which
all of the above twenty two significant observations were drawn. The twenty
two significant observations about PA 103 were drawn from UK AAIB 2/90 released
statements and photographs of wreckage reconstruction. barry@corazon.com
www.corazon.com
Boeing 747 Comparison between UAL 811 and
TWA 800
TWA800hullrupture.html Picture of Hull
Rupture in NTSB TWA 800 Photo
UAL 811 aft midspan latch rupture pictures
and text
Boeing 747 TWA 800 cargo door reconstruction
altered to fit Two pictures of door
TWA 800 reconstruction
Air India Flight 182 door text
UAL Flight 811 Cargo Door picture
TWA Flight 800 Cargo Door pictures
TWA Flight 800 Cargo Door blowup
pictures
TWA Boeing 747 paint Scheme
Reasoning for cargo door explanation
Sudden Loud Sound on CVRs
Boeing 747 Cargo door blowup areas
for Pan Am 103, TWA 800, UAL 811, and Air India 182.
Boeing 747 TWA 800 door notes and comments
on wreckage
Boeing 747 UAL 811 and PA 103
comparison
Boeing 747 Port view of TWA 800, paint
smears and hinge starboard
Contents